EU Scrutiny of Meta’s “Pay or Consent” Model for Facebook and Instagram

The European Commission has recently raised concerns over Meta’s newly implemented “pay or consent” advertising model for Facebook and Instagram users within the European Union (EU). According to preliminary findings released on Monday, regulators believe that Meta’s approach may not align with the language in the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The “Pay or Consent” Model

Introduced in November 2023, Meta’s model offers EU users two primary choices: pay a monthly fee for an ad-free experience or continue using the platforms for free but with personalized advertisements. The European Commission, however, argues that this binary option does not provide a sufficiently equivalent alternative that is less personalized, which is a requirement under the DMA.

Meta’s Compliance Efforts

Meta has highlighted its extensive efforts to comply with the DMA given the scrutiny. The company reports that over 11,000 employees have been designing and implementing new systems and user controls to adhere to the DMA’s requirements. Meta claims to have invested more than 590,000 hours of engineering and technical work—an impressive commitment equivalent to over six decades of work.

Nick Clegg, Meta’s President of Global Affairs, has expressed concerns regarding the potential negative impact of stringent regulations on European innovation. Additionally, Meta has proposed reducing the cost of its subscription service, although it awaits further feedback from regulators.

Potential Consequences and Regulatory Stance

The European Commission’s investigation is expected to conclude by March 25, 2025. Should the concerns be validated, Meta could face fines of up to 10% of its total worldwide turnover, possibly doubling these penalties for repeated infractions. This investigation highlights the ongoing tension between large tech companies and EU regulators over data privacy, market competition, and digital innovation issues.

Margrethe Vestager, European Commission Executive Vice President in charge of competition policy, emphasized the importance of this investigation: “Our investigation aims to ensure contestability in markets where gatekeepers like Meta have been accumulating personal data of millions of EU citizens over many years. Our preliminary view is that Meta’s advertising model fails to comply with the Digital Markets Act. And we want to empower citizens to be able to take control over their own data and choose a less personalized ads experience.”

Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market, added: “Today we make another important step to ensure full compliance with the DMA by Meta. Our preliminary view is that Meta’s ‘Pay or Consent’ business model is in breach of the DMA. The DMA is there to give back to the users the power to decide how their data is used and ensure innovative companies can compete on equal footing with tech giants on data access.”

Meta’s Response

In response to the Commission’s preliminary findings, a Meta spokesperson stated: “Subscription for no ads follows the direction of the highest court in Europe and complies with the DMA. We look forward to further constructive dialogue with the European Commission to bring this investigation to a close.”

Conclusion

This case underscores the broader conflict between regulatory bodies and tech giants, as the EU seeks to enforce stringent data privacy and market competition laws while companies like Meta navigate compliance without stifling innovation. The outcome of this investigation will likely set a significant precedent for the future of digital advertising and user data management in the EU.

Click here to learn more about our Preference and Consent Management Platform! Clarip takes enterprise privacy governance to the next level and helps organizations reduce risks, engage better, and gain customers’ trust! Contact us at www.clarip.com or call Clarip at 1-888-252-5653 for a demo.

Email Now:

Mike Mango, VP of Sales
mmango@clarip.com