Risk and Control Self Assessment (RCSA) Framework for Privacy
The Clarip Data Risk Intelligence scans aid businesses with the identification of third party vendors for regulatory and compliance purposes. As part of third-party risk management in the privacy context, organizations need to know all of their service providers and what personal data is being shared with them. How can a business use this information?
In addition to the standard usage as part of the GDPR Article 28 process, organizations that complete the Data Risk Intelligence scan can use this data as part of their internal audit process and vendor risk management.
If your organization has not yet established a mature internal controls process, this can be accomplished by usage of an established controls framework such as the Risk and Control Self Assessment (RCSA). There are a number of other risk frameworks that your organization could adopt, but this is a popular one.
What is an RCSA and Where is it Used?
An RCSA framework is used by companies to analyze their operational risk.
The RCSA was developed after a four volume report on internal controls was released by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 1992. The systems would become a standard in evaluating compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
The RCSA framework is also often used by financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements for an annual self review of operational risks firm-wide. Notwithstanding its use in the financial industry, it could also be used as a methodology for evaluating third-party vendor risks.
An RCSA has become an accepted means of satisfying corporate governance requirements and acts as a valuable audit tool.
What is the General Approach to an RCSA?
An RCSA typically consists of:
– Identification of business objectives, targets, or process goals.
– Identification of risks that could threaten those objectives.
– Identify the controls in place to prevent or limit those risks.
– Identify the roles and processes responsible for performing the controls.
– Assess the effectiveness of the controls and the mitigated or unmitigated risk remaining after the establishment of those controls.
When an organization conducts an RCSA exercise, it generally is conducted by each business unit. The assessments are then collected and compiled to create a comprehensive understanding of organizational risks within an organization.
What are the Approaches and Techniques to Performing an RCSA?
Organizations can adapt their approach to their individual case as there is no one size fits all approach to conducting and implementing the RCSA. Instead, the best approach may depend on its internal culture, size, complexity of issues and governance. Nevertheless, a few different approaches have been developed:
Some organizations gather their key stakeholders together to create a dialogue around their objectives, risks and controls. The benefits of this approach are considered to be reduced paperwork requirements, raising overall awareness of risks, and enhancing risk management skills across the staff of an organization. Advanced preparation can define the workshops objectives and provide context to participants on the contributions expected of them.
This approach should be familiar to organizations that have conducted Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) or Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). Standard questionnaires can assist respondents in the identification of risks and controls as well as evaluation of them for the organization. However, it requires the development of the survey, ensuring completion by the relevant stakeholders, and compilation of the results across the stakeholders.
3. Hybrid Combinations
A mix of workshops and questionnaires can be used to avoid burdening participants but maximize the results of the RCSA exercise.
RCSA for Vendor Management
Although the prior information has not specifically discussed the relationship between the RCSA and vendor management, it can be used or adapted to the context of third-party vendors by an organization concerned about privacy, cybersecurity and other risks associated with third-parties. It provides a common language and approach to the identification and mitigation of risks that applies to vendor management and privacy as much as its overall attempt to assess organization-wide risks.
There is a great deal of other information available online about the performance of a Risk and Control Self-Assessment. We hope that this introduction to the subject provides sufficient information for you to assess whether your organization is interested in exploring additional resources on this controls framework.
Contact Clarip Today for Help with CCPA and GPDR
The Clarip team and data privacy software are prepared to help your organization improve its privacy practices. Click here to contact us (return messages within 24 hours) or call 1-888-252-5653 to schedule a demo or speak to a member of the Clarip team.
If your challenge right now is CCPA compliance for your California operations, allow us to show you our CCPA software. From consent management software to offer the option to opt-out of the sale of personal data, to a powerful DSAR Portal to facilitate the right to access and delete, Clarip offers enterprise privacy management at an affordable price.
If you are preparing your European operations for GDPR compliance, we can help through our modular GDPR software. Whether you are looking to start the process with GDPR data mapping software, increase automation in your privacy program with DPIA software, or handle ePrivacy with a cookie consent manager, Clarip has the privacy platform that you need to bolster your program.
Click here to contact us (return messages within 24 hours) or call 1-888-252-5653 to schedule a demo and speak to a member of the Clarip team.
Vendor Risk Management Software
GDPR Vendor Management & Third Party Privacy Risk Assessment
Vendor Audit Process
Service Providers and the CCPA Right to Opt Out
GDPR Data Processing Agreement under Article 28
What is a Data Processor under GDPR?
Differences between a GDPR Data Controller vs. Data Processor