Navigating The Global Landscape of AI Privacy Legislation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries worldwide, raising significant privacy concerns. To address these challenges, various U.S. states and countries have implemented AI privacy laws. This article provides an overview of these regulations, highlighting efforts to protect data privacy in the AI era.

United States: State-Level AI Privacy Laws

In the absence of comprehensive federal AI privacy legislation, several U.S. states have enacted laws and provisions covering AI, automated decision-making, and automated profiling. While these laws primarily focus on data privacy, they impact AI systems due to their data-intensive nature. Here are some key states with notable AI privacy laws:

1. California:

   • The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and its successor, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), grant Californians rights to know, delete, and opt out of personal data sales. These laws impact AI systems processing Californians’ data.
   • The California AI Transparency Act (SB 942): The proposed California AI Transparency Act mandates that businesses disclose when AI is being used in decision-making processes that affect consumers. This includes providing clear and understandable information about how AI systems operate and their decision-making criteria.

2. Virginia:

   • The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) includes provisions that relate to automated decision-making, including profiling. The VCDPA gives consumers the right to opt out of profiling that could lead to automated decisions and requires businesses to conduct data protection assessments for activities that could pose a “heightened risk of harm”. These activities include targeted advertising, sales of personal data, and some types of profiling. Profiling could be considered harmful if it could lead to unfair treatment of consumers, financial or physical damage, or intrusion into their private affairs.

3. Colorado:

   • The Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) requires data protection assessments for high-risk data processing activities, including AI systems, and grants consumers rights to access, correct, delete, and opt-out.
   • The Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA): The CAIA, signed into law on May 17, 2024, is the first comprehensive U.S. AI law targeting “high-risk artificial intelligence systems.” The Act aims to ensure responsible AI development and deployment, focusing on transparency, accountability, and protection of individual rights. The law applies to all businesses in Colorado using high-risk AI systems, regardless of consumer numbers. Key provisions include:
   • Risk-Based Classification: High-risk AI systems, which include those used in education, employment, finance, government services, healthcare, housing, insurance, and legal services, are subject to stringent requirements. Low-risk systems face fewer regulations. The law excludes systems performing narrow tasks or those used in cybersecurity and spam filtering.
   • Transparency and Accountability: Organizations must provide clear information to users and conduct algorithmic impact assessments. Large companies must implement risk management policies and make public summaries of deployed systems and their data usage.
   • Algorithmic Discrimination: Developers and deployers must avoid unlawful differential treatment based on various classifications. However, self-testing and diversity efforts are exempt.
   • Data Protection and Privacy: The Act emphasizes data minimization, data quality, consent, and user rights.
   • Human Oversight: The Act ensures that human operators can intervene in AI decision-making.
   • Enforcement and Penalties: The Act establishes a regulatory body for oversight and imposes fines for non-compliance.

4. Utah:

   • Effective May 1, 2024, Utah introduces the AI Policy Act (AI Act), amending the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (UCPA) and Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCSPA) to enhance AI-related consumer protections. Key changes include explicit definitions and allowances for synthetic data—artificial data mimicking statistical properties of real data without containing personal details. This promotes privacy while enabling businesses to use synthetic data without it being classified as personal data.
   • The amendments mandate transparency for AI interactions, requiring clear disclosures when consumers engage with generative AI, especially in regulated occupations. Additionally, organizations are liable for AI-related consumer protection violations. A second bill mandates AI-generated political content to be clearly marked and establishes harsher penalties for AI-facilitated crimes. Utah’s proactive approach sets a regulatory framework for AI use in consumer protection, providing clarity and best practices for organizations.

5. Connecticut:

   • The Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA), effective July 1, 2023, grants rights to access, correct, delete, and restrict data processing, including data processed by AI systems. CTDPA gives consumers the right to opt out of automated profiling that results in significant automated decisions.

European Union: The AI Act

The European Union (EU) is leading the way in AI regulation with its Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) going into effect on August 1st, 2024, with provisions coming into operation gradually over the following 6 to 36 months. This comprehensive framework aims to regulate AI development, deployment, and use across the EU, taking a risk-based approach to ensure safety and trust.

1. Risk-Based Classification:
   • Unacceptable Risk: Bans AI systems that pose a clear threat to safety and rights, such as social scoring by governments and real-time biometric identification in public spaces.
   • High Risk: Imposes strict requirements on AI systems with significant impact, including those in critical infrastructures, education, employment, and law enforcement.
   • Limited Risk: Requires transparency for AI systems with limited risk, such as chatbots.
   • Minimal Risk: Allows minimal regulation for AI systems with low risk, like AI-driven spam filters and video games.

2. Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems:
   • Risk Management System: Establish and maintain a risk management system throughout the AI lifecycle.
   • Data Governance: Use high-quality datasets to minimize risks.
   • Technical Documentation and Record-Keeping: Maintain detailed documentation for compliance and oversight.
   • Transparency and Information Provision: Provide users with clear information about the AI system.
   • Human Oversight: Ensure measures for human oversight to prevent risks.
   • Robustness, Accuracy, and Security: Meet high standards for accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity.

3. Conformity Assessment and CE Marking:
   • High-risk AI systems must undergo a conformity assessment before market entry, involving testing, inspection, and certification.
   • Compliant AI systems receive the CE marking, indicating they meet EU safety, health, and environmental protection standards.

4. Enforcement and Penalties:
   • National authorities are responsible for market surveillance and enforcement, coordinated by the European Artificial Intelligence Board (EAIB).
   • Non-compliance can result in fines of up to €30 million or 6% of total worldwide annual turnover for serious violations.

International AI Privacy Laws

Several countries have implemented or proposed AI-specific privacy laws to address AI’s unique challenges:

1. Canada: The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and the forthcoming Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) regulate AI and ensure responsible AI development.
2. China: The Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) sets stringent requirements for data processing, including by AI systems, emphasizing transparency and user consent.
3. Japan: The Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) governs personal data processing, with guidelines on AI ethics and governance for responsible AI development.
4. Brazil: The General Data Protection Law (LGPD) mirrors the GDPR, regulating personal data processing by AI systems with a focus on transparency and consent.
5. South Korea: The Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) is one of Asia’s strictest data protection laws, impacting AI systems that process personal data. South Korea is also developing specific AI regulations.

Conclusion

As AI continues to evolve, so does the regulatory landscape. The EU’s AI Act represents a pioneering effort to comprehensively regulate AI, influencing global standards. U.S. states and countries worldwide are implementing AI privacy laws to protect data and ensure responsible AI development. These regulations aim to balance innovation with safety and trust, setting benchmarks for AI governance and ethical practices globally. Businesses must stay informed and compliant to navigate this complex regulatory environment and build trust with stakeholders.

To learn more about US privacy laws, check out
the Clarip US Privacy Law Tracker

Clarip’s Data Privacy Governance Platform ensures compliance with all consumer privacy regulations, including the “Do Not Sell/Do Not Share My Personal Information” solution. Allow customers to submit, revoke and update granular consent with Clarip’s Universal Consent Management. Clarip takes enterprise privacy governance to the next level and helps organizations reduce risks, engage better, and gain customers’ trust! Contact us at www.clarip.com or call Clarip at 1-888-252-5653 for a demo.

Email Now:

Mike Mango, VP of Sales
mmango@clarip.com

Related Articles:

Data Privacy and the Future of Digital Marketing
US Privacy Law Tracker
Understanding US Data Privacy Law Fines
Evolution of digital consent and preferences
What Is GPC (Global Privacy Control), And why does it matter?